About CAPSI: Difference between revisions

From OnTrackNorthAmerica
m (Automatic uplod by document formatter)
m (Automatic uplod by document formatter)
Line 1: Line 1:
OnTrackNorthAmerica (OTNA) was founded by Michael Sussman in 2007 as a nonprofit 501c3 transportation think tank and consultancy co-leading society in redesigning industrial systems to support sustainable life. <b>Michael Sussman</b> began his career in transportation in 1994 by launching Strategic Rail Finance, a North American transportation-industry consulting firm, and has since advised on infrastructure-related projects, companies, and systems for private and public sector clients in 44 states and Canada.</br></br>
<i>       </i><i> “Whenever I hear that we need a national dialogue, as in, we need a national dialogue on gun control, police reform, or voter rights, I wonder, where exactly would we have that dialogue? In the newspapers, on social media, in our courts? These venues are ill-suited for </i><i>substantive </i><i>national</i><i> </i><i>dialogues.</i>                                                                                                                        </br>


</br></br>
                                                                  -Michael Sussman</br>


At OTNA, we uphold objectivity and nonpartisanship. Our autonomy from financial, political, or personal interests undergirds our ethics. Historically, industrial growth has prioritized economic advancement over community and environmental stewardship. We advance industrial systems that are financially profitable and sustainable.  </br></br>
Too often, industrial sectors operate in fragmented silos striving to reach arbitrary and, at times, conflicting goals. Industrial development occurs as a series of individual projects instead of whole systems. We must redesign our supply chains to be as efficient and sustainable as possible to survive the threats of climate change. Addressing these challenges requires unprecedented collaboration between all stakeholders within a forum that allows us to build trust and create real action plans. CAPSI convenes stakeholders across all industrial sectors to facilitate whole systems planning for profitable and sustainable industrial systems. We do this through our IntelliSynthesis® dialogue process within topic-focused IntelliConferences®.  </br>


</br></br>
As a society, we aren’t lacking intelligence. What we lack is a communication framework that builds solutions without being derailed by excessive competition, mistrust, or vested interests focused on short-term profits and maintaining power. Over thirty years as trusted advisors working with thousands of partners from industry, government, academia, and community organizations, OnTrackNorthAmerica has developed a powerful tool for mobilizing the knowledge, intelligence, and goodwill all around us. CAPSI utilizes IntelliSynthesis, our breakthrough question-and-response dialogue method, where profitable and sustainable industrial systems are created. Despite preconceptions, addressing all elements of a system makes it easier to build consensus and develop action plans. The more elements of a system we identify, measure, and consider, the more we turn its interactions into positive synergies. New solutions appear that would have otherwise been concealed. </br>


OTNA continually embraces the latest perspectives that inform progress toward these goals. We support investments in projects that enable the transition from fossil fuels, petrochemicals, and environmental stresses while acknowledging pragmatic challenges. OTNA values rationality and paths that provide the greatest benefit to the most people. </br></br>
Supply chain shortcomings became public during COVID-19 when goods were stalled at ports and intermodal transfer points for months. The Biden administration responded with a massive public investment in infrastructure. Unfortunately, this precious capital is allotted for individual competing projects while overall system inefficiencies remain. Consequently, we continue to stimulate more highway-centric supply chain activity and underutilize railroads’ energy, space, and capital efficiencies for moving heavy weight over land. </br>


</br></br>
Consider how transportation has typically been planned, or more accurately, not planned. Supply chains have evolved as a chaotic response to shippers’ and developers' indiscriminate land transactions, regardless of the transportation inefficiencies those choices impose. Railroads, ocean carriers, freight forwarders, ports, trucking companies, distributors, and shippers operate in a competitive, and in some cases monopolistic, mode, neither of which allows for the collaboration needed for supply chain efficiency. Creating sustainable, multimodal industrial systems compels us to transition to comprehensive supply chain, land use, and transportation planning.  </br>


<b>OTNA has developed state and regional plans, tools, </b><b>analyses</b><b>, and paradigms support</b><b>ing</b><b> these </b><b>values</b><b>. </b></br></br>
Yes, a profound shift is needed. If not transformed, this mistrust will cost us and our children the chance of a sustainable, prosperous future. Fortunately, when we approach conversations openly and acceptingly, we inspire trust and cooperation in others. In co-creating CAPSI, stakeholders envision, articulate, and commit to shared principles, protocols, and desired outcomes. When people shift from a competitive to a collaborative mindset, they create policies, programs, and commercial opportunities that serve the collective good. As individuals, we can only go so far; together, we will reach our highest potential by tapping into our collective intelligence.</br>


</br></br>
<i>         “These are powerful ambitions. Thankfully, we now have the tools to produce action plans for success. Time is of the essence. We live in a critical moment of </i><i>potential </i><i>environmental </i><i>collapse </i><i>alongside the need to expand economic vitality to more people. </i><i>R</i><i>edesigning industrial systems will deliver both environmental and economic sustainability. Join us in CAPSI for a brighter</i><i> </i><i>future!”</i>                                                                                  </br>


In 2023, OTNA led a four-county stakeholder process in New Mexico in the aftermath of a 350,000-acre forest fire resulting in the New Mexico Forestry Business Plan.</br></br>
:-Michael Sussman</br>


In 2021, OTNA convened hundreds of transportation stakeholders to create Nevada’s 2021 State Rail Plan, a new whole-systems paradigm for statewide rail-enabled economic development.</br></br>
</br>
 
On December 11, 2008, OTNA gathered industry and government leaders in the U.S. Capitol Building to set a new collaborative framework for freight rail transportation efficiency.</br></br>
 
On December 8, 1998, OTNA convened a rail transportation educational event in the U.S. Capitol Building for 55 congressional staff. </br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>OnTrackNorthAmerica Frequently Collaborates with Partners in Academia </b></br></br>
 
Dr. Barbara Gray, founder of Penn State University’s Center for Research in Conflict and Negotiation, has contributed significantly to OTNA’s work. </br></br>
 
The University of Tennessee’s Institute for a Secure and Sustainable Future provided research and development assistance for OTNA’s Land Freight Lifecycle Impact Calculator.</br></br>
 
Philadelphia’s Temple University hosted Michael’s talk, “How Collaboration, Trust, and Railroads Will Save the World,” on December 5th, 2023.</br></br>
 
The Transportation Research Forum honored Michael with its 2024 annual President’s Award.</br></br>
 
Michael serves on the Industry Advisory Board of the six-university consortium, Center for Freight Transportation and Efficient & Resilient Supply Chains  </br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>He has contributed </b><b>to </b><b>improving public policy by meeting with s</b><b>taff or leaders of 68 U.S. Senate and 1</b><b>65</b><b> U.S. House offices</b><b>.  </b></br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
In March of 2011, Michael was the only private sector invitee to a U.S. House Railroad Subcommittee Staff Workshop to explore ways to improve the FRA RRIF loan program.</br></br>
 
::On February 17, 2011, he testified before the U.S. House of Representatives Railroad Subcommittee on reforms to the Federal Railroad Administration’s Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) program.</br></br>
 
On October 19, 2005, he spoke before the Surface Transportation Board on the 25th anniversary of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980.</br></br>
 
<b>
</b><b>Representative acknowledgments of these efforts:</b><b> </b></br></br>
 
Thank you letters from Republican House Transportation Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Frank Wolf and Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller’s Chief of Staff.</br></br>
 
In 2003, he contributed to Washington State produce shippers by designing and writing important elements of the Washington State Produce Railcar Pool Act as passed by the 2003 state legislature.</br></br>
 
In 1999, he worked with the Federal Railroad Administration to eliminate audited financial statement requirements for Class II and III railroads from the Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing Act (RRIF loan program).</br></br>
 
In November of 1997 he was responsible for making freight rail projects eligible in H.R.115 – the National Infrastructure Development Act.</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>Michael ‘</b><b>s </b><b>writing</b><b> </b><b>has</b><b> </b><b>been </b><b>published in </b><b>many</b><b> transportation industry journals</b><b>:</b></br></br>
 
Railway Age, December 2014, “Revitalizing Direct Rail Service”</br></br>
 
Railway Age, April 2011, “A RRIF-Centered Capitalization Growth Strategy”</br></br>
 
Railway Age, September 2008, “Leveraging Capital for the Entire Industry”</br></br>
 
Transportation Quarterly, Fall 2002, “Regional and Short Line Railroads in the United States”</br></br>
 
Association of Transportation Law, Logistics & Policy, Fall 2000, “Assessing the Process of Creating the RRIF Program”</br></br>
 
Progressive Railroading, June 1998, “Getting a Lender’s Attention”</br></br>
 
::</br></br>
 
::<i><b>Board of Directors</b></i></br></br>
 
<h3>Michael Sussman</h3></br></br>
 
<h4>    Chairman, OnTrackNorthAmerica and Chairman & CEO, Strategic Rail Finance</h4></br></br>
 
<h3>Eugene N. (“Gene”) Cipriani</h3></br></br>
 
<h4>Attorney; former advisor to the United States Railway Association (U.S.R.A.); former in-house corporate counsel for Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA)</h4></br></br>
 
<h3>Daniel R. Elliott</h3></br></br>
 
<h4>    Transportation Attorney, Former Chairman of U.S. Surface Transportation Board</h4></br></br>
 
<h3>R. Powell Felix</h3></br></br>
 
<h4>    Founder, Indiana Boxcar Corporation</h4></br></br>
 
<h3>Jim Hoecker</h3></br></br>
 
<h4>Founder, Hoecker Energy Law & Policy PLLC, former Chair of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission</h4></br></br>
 
::</br></br>
 
::</br></br>
 
::<i><b>Advisory Board </b></i></br></br>
 
::</br></br>
 
<b>Daniel Burgess </b></br></br>
 
    Local Chairman, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Division 456</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>Dr. Beverly A. Cigler</b></br></br>
 
    Professor of Public Policy & Administration, Penn State Harrisburg</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>Steve Gothreau</b></br></br>
 
    Norfolk Southern Rail Train & Engine Service (Retired)</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>Philip Mortimer</b></br></br>
 
    Director, TruckTrain Industries</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>Mingzhou Jin, Ph.D</b>.</br></br>
 
    Associate Head Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Tennessee</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>Brian Rademacher</b></br></br>
 
    CEcD Economic Development Director, City of Ormond Beach</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>Karen Risa Robbins</b></br></br>
 
    Principal, Washington Progress Group</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>Peter Schwartzman</b></br></br>
 
    Associate Professor & Chair, Knox College Environmental Studies Program</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
<b>Dr. Joseph Schwieterman</b></br></br>
 
    Director, DePaul University, Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development</br></br>
 
</br></br>
 
</br></br>

Revision as of 14:03, 3 October 2024

 “Whenever I hear that we need a national dialogue, as in, we need a national dialogue on gun control, police reform, or voter rights, I wonder, where exactly would we have that dialogue? In the newspapers, on social media, in our courts? These venues are ill-suited for substantive national dialogues.”                                                                                                                        

                                                                  				 -Michael Sussman

Too often, industrial sectors operate in fragmented silos striving to reach arbitrary and, at times, conflicting goals. Industrial development occurs as a series of individual projects instead of whole systems. We must redesign our supply chains to be as efficient and sustainable as possible to survive the threats of climate change. Addressing these challenges requires unprecedented collaboration between all stakeholders within a forum that allows us to build trust and create real action plans. CAPSI convenes stakeholders across all industrial sectors to facilitate whole systems planning for profitable and sustainable industrial systems. We do this through our IntelliSynthesis® dialogue process within topic-focused IntelliConferences®.

As a society, we aren’t lacking intelligence. What we lack is a communication framework that builds solutions without being derailed by excessive competition, mistrust, or vested interests focused on short-term profits and maintaining power. Over thirty years as trusted advisors working with thousands of partners from industry, government, academia, and community organizations, OnTrackNorthAmerica has developed a powerful tool for mobilizing the knowledge, intelligence, and goodwill all around us. CAPSI utilizes IntelliSynthesis, our breakthrough question-and-response dialogue method, where profitable and sustainable industrial systems are created. Despite preconceptions, addressing all elements of a system makes it easier to build consensus and develop action plans. The more elements of a system we identify, measure, and consider, the more we turn its interactions into positive synergies. New solutions appear that would have otherwise been concealed.

Supply chain shortcomings became public during COVID-19 when goods were stalled at ports and intermodal transfer points for months. The Biden administration responded with a massive public investment in infrastructure. Unfortunately, this precious capital is allotted for individual competing projects while overall system inefficiencies remain. Consequently, we continue to stimulate more highway-centric supply chain activity and underutilize railroads’ energy, space, and capital efficiencies for moving heavy weight over land.

Consider how transportation has typically been planned, or more accurately, not planned. Supply chains have evolved as a chaotic response to shippers’ and developers' indiscriminate land transactions, regardless of the transportation inefficiencies those choices impose. Railroads, ocean carriers, freight forwarders, ports, trucking companies, distributors, and shippers operate in a competitive, and in some cases monopolistic, mode, neither of which allows for the collaboration needed for supply chain efficiency. Creating sustainable, multimodal industrial systems compels us to transition to comprehensive supply chain, land use, and transportation planning.

Yes, a profound shift is needed. If not transformed, this mistrust will cost us and our children the chance of a sustainable, prosperous future. Fortunately, when we approach conversations openly and acceptingly, we inspire trust and cooperation in others. In co-creating CAPSI, stakeholders envision, articulate, and commit to shared principles, protocols, and desired outcomes. When people shift from a competitive to a collaborative mindset, they create policies, programs, and commercial opportunities that serve the collective good. As individuals, we can only go so far; together, we will reach our highest potential by tapping into our collective intelligence.

         “These are powerful ambitions. Thankfully, we now have the tools to produce action plans for success. Time is of the essence. We live in a critical moment of potential environmental collapse alongside the need to expand economic vitality to more people. Redesigning industrial systems will deliver both environmental and economic sustainability. Join us in CAPSI for a brighter future!”                                                                                 

-Michael Sussman