Rail Business Culture Transformation: Difference between revisions
From OnTrackNorthAmerica
(Created page with "== Context == * The Class I rail industry’s historical and cultural dynamics and recently adopted business strategies have contributed to a post-2006 market share and volume decline. * Focusing on short-term profitability, cost-cutting, and an outdated corporate culture has negatively impacted customer success and satisfaction, employee morale, expertise retention, and innovation. == Goals == * Transform the railroad business culture to support a more vital contrib...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Questions == | == Questions == | ||
=== Core Question: === | |||
* What reorientation would transform the rail business culture to balance the interests of investors with the professional and personal interests of key stakeholders? | * What reorientation would transform the rail business culture to balance the interests of investors with the professional and personal interests of key stakeholders? | ||
=== Round 1 Questions === | |||
==== Existing Railroad Culture ==== | ==== Existing Railroad Culture ==== |
Revision as of 19:52, 5 June 2024
Context
- The Class I rail industry’s historical and cultural dynamics and recently adopted business strategies have contributed to a post-2006 market share and volume decline.
- Focusing on short-term profitability, cost-cutting, and an outdated corporate culture has negatively impacted customer success and satisfaction, employee morale, expertise retention, and innovation.
Goals
- Transform the railroad business culture to support a more vital contribution to supply chain efficiency and satisfaction, success, and safety for all stakeholders.
Questions
Core Question:
- What reorientation would transform the rail business culture to balance the interests of investors with the professional and personal interests of key stakeholders?
Round 1 Questions
Existing Railroad Culture
- What railroad management and investor dynamics create a risk-averse decision-making culture that stifles growth and modernization?
- What cultural drivers have led railroad boards and investors to focus on stock buybacks and shorter payback windows at the expense of long-term investments for market share growth?
- How has the rail business culture led to:
- Lower respect and adoption of staff ideas?
- Staff frustration and poor retention?
- How has the culture of hierarchical authority for decision-making impacted:
- Reliability of first-mile and last-mile services?
- Ability to advance customer-centric market opportunities?
- Safety of freight train operations?
- Quality of professional and personal life for train, yard, and engine staff?
- In-the-field operating authorities by experienced train, yard, and engine crews reacting to real-time local conditions?
- What skill sets are in short supply in railroad organizations that could be developed to meet the needs of customers, communities, and employees?
Round 2
A New Future for Railroad Culture
- What do we want rail business culture to lead to?
- What cultural shifts need to occur such that employees, especially in-the-field operating employees, are viewed as collaborative partners with management in creating organizations that meet the needs of all stakeholders?
- What work and lifestyle experience among rail management do we want the business culture to support?
- How can senior management and the board of directors better collaborate with company staff to re-establish a meaningful and satisfying growth and improvement culture?
- What cultural shifts need to occur:
- To best retain railroad subject matter expertise?
- For customers and trucking partners to trust that rail operating decisions, services, and rates are respectful of their needs and investments?
- For communities and other public entities to view railroads as creating a safer, less congested, environmentally sustainable option for moving freight?