OTNA Applied Research Model: Difference between revisions
From OnTrackNorthAmerica
(Automatic uplod by document formatter) |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Applied Research Model for Center for Freight Transportation for Efficient & Resilient Supply Chain (FERSC)</br> | |||
# <b>Imagination/Purpose-</b>What issues in the field are we inspired to research, given our areas of interest, concern, and expertise? | |||
## What is the problem in the field that we want to contribute to solving? | |||
## Why is this problem significant? | |||
# <b>Conception-</b>What conception of our project would lead us to generate the optimal research approach? | |||
## Who would benefit from this solution? | |||
## What needs to be understood? | |||
## Who must we relate with to inform our understanding of the problem? | |||
## How do we measure the implications of the problem and the solution? | |||
## What dynamics do stakeholders indicate are problematic? | |||
## What needs to be changed, transformed, or advanced? | |||
## Who do we want to educate (stakeholder groups) about our observations, discoveries, and inventions? | |||
## How do we execute the education? | |||
# <b>Design-</b>How do we want to design our work? | |||
## What can we do to make or assist with these contributions? | |||
## What tools and methods are available to develop the solution? | |||
## What new tools and methods should we develop? | |||
## How will we know we have accomplished our purpose? | |||
## What factors should we consider when determining the time for completion? | |||
## What resources can we gather for this project? | |||
## What partners can we establish for this project? | |||
# <b>Implementation- </b>How will we execute our plan | |||
## What is our game plan? | |||
## Who is on our team, encompassing academic, government, industry, non-profit, and community partners? | |||
## What are each team member's responsibilitiesovernment, industry, non-profit, and community partners? | |||
## What are each team member's responsibilities<br> | |||
<b> | # <b>Completion/Dissemination- </b>How can we best present our work for maximum uptake? | ||
## Which audiences do we want our work product to reach? | |||
## What documents, content, spreadsheets, and models would be most helpful? | |||
## How do we prepare and present this information to partners and stakeholders so that it is accessible to the broadest audience? | |||
<b>Principles:</b> | |||
<ol class = "abc"> | |||
<li>Project conception and design require more input and guidance from industry-experienced individuals.</li> | |||
<li>Project execution then needs more direct dialogue with stakeholders in the field.</li> | |||
< | <li>Academic rigor does not preclude tailoring material to be understood by relevant industry and government stakeholders.</li> | ||
<li>Language and writing need more quality editing to communicate effectively with stakeholders.</li> | |||
<li>Data, formulas, and methods must be presented with explanations that render them understandable and usable by primary users in the field.</br></li> | |||
</ol> | |||
Data, formulas, and methods must be presented with explanations that render them understandable and usable by primary users in the field.</br> | |||
</ |
Latest revision as of 14:45, 1 October 2024
Applied Research Model for Center for Freight Transportation for Efficient & Resilient Supply Chain (FERSC)
- Imagination/Purpose-What issues in the field are we inspired to research, given our areas of interest, concern, and expertise?
- What is the problem in the field that we want to contribute to solving?
- Why is this problem significant?
- Conception-What conception of our project would lead us to generate the optimal research approach?
- Who would benefit from this solution?
- What needs to be understood?
- Who must we relate with to inform our understanding of the problem?
- How do we measure the implications of the problem and the solution?
- What dynamics do stakeholders indicate are problematic?
- What needs to be changed, transformed, or advanced?
- Who do we want to educate (stakeholder groups) about our observations, discoveries, and inventions?
- How do we execute the education?
- Design-How do we want to design our work?
- What can we do to make or assist with these contributions?
- What tools and methods are available to develop the solution?
- What new tools and methods should we develop?
- How will we know we have accomplished our purpose?
- What factors should we consider when determining the time for completion?
- What resources can we gather for this project?
- What partners can we establish for this project?
- Implementation- How will we execute our plan
- What is our game plan?
- Who is on our team, encompassing academic, government, industry, non-profit, and community partners?
- What are each team member's responsibilitiesovernment, industry, non-profit, and community partners?
- What are each team member's responsibilities
- Completion/Dissemination- How can we best present our work for maximum uptake?
- Which audiences do we want our work product to reach?
- What documents, content, spreadsheets, and models would be most helpful?
- How do we prepare and present this information to partners and stakeholders so that it is accessible to the broadest audience?
Principles:
- Project conception and design require more input and guidance from industry-experienced individuals.
- Project execution then needs more direct dialogue with stakeholders in the field.
- Academic rigor does not preclude tailoring material to be understood by relevant industry and government stakeholders.
- Language and writing need more quality editing to communicate effectively with stakeholders.
- Data, formulas, and methods must be presented with explanations that render them understandable and usable by primary users in the field.